Project DINGGIN: Empowering Communities through Risk‐Based and Inclusive Cash Transfer in Disaster‐Prone Areas in Bangladesh and Philippines

Authors

Rhinadel M. Canete, Samantha Kay Lisay, Md. Nazmus Sayadat Mahmud

Abstract

Disaster-prone communities in Albay, Philippines and Bhola, Bangladesh, face recurring typhoons, cyclones, and floods that simultaneously destroy homes, disrupt livelihoods, and threaten food security. Traditional cash transfer programs (CTPs) for disaster relief often lack inclusive, risk-informed design and fail to account for the intersectional vulnerabilities of at-risk groups. Project DINGGIN (Dynamic Inclusive Network for Governance, Guidance, Intersectionality, and Nexus) addresses this gap by developing a risk-based, community-informed cash transfer framework. The approach bridges bottom-up risk data gathered through household surveys, participatory risk mapping, focus groups, and interviews with top-down policy frameworks within a humanitarian-development-peace nexus approach. Data from Albay and Bhola revealed that affected households prioritise simultaneous home rebuilding and income recovery; however, existing cash assistance is fragmented and not well-coordinated. Using a decision-support dashboard, local governments and communities co-developed tailored Cash Transfer Values (CTVs) reflecting each community’s specific disaster risks and socioeconomic needs. The results demonstrate that an integrated cash transfer strategy—addressing shelter, food, and livelihoods together—can provide immediate relief while strengthening long-term resilience. For example, households in high-risk zones received larger grants for shelter reinforcement and livelihood restoration, aligning assistance with locally identified needs. This risk-informed, inclusive CTP model improved community ownership and met humanitarian Sphere standards for equity and adequacy. The discussion of Project DINGGIN’s pilot indicates strengthened multi-sectoral coordination and highlights areas for improvement, such as providing multi-phase support beyond the emergency phase, offering financial literacy training to beneficiaries, and implementing adaptive disbursement schedules. The study concludes that empowering communities to co-design cash interventions not only ensures a more effective disaster response but also institutionalises resilience-building for future crises, aligning with national disaster management plans and international frameworks.

Keywords

community-managed disaster risk reduction (CMDRR), risk-based cash transfer, hybrid governance, participatory risk mapping, disaster preparedness, humanitarian nexus, community resilience

Publication Details

Journal: International Journal of Disaster Risk Management
Year: 2025
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 339-366
Published: 2025-06-16

DOI and Full Text

DOI: View DOI record
Article Page: View article page
PDF: Download full-text PDF

Suggested Citation

M. Canete, R., Lisay, S. K., & Sayadat Mahmud, M. N. (2025). Project DINGGIN: Empowering Communities through Risk‐Based and Inclusive Cash Transfer in Disaster‐Prone Areas in Bangladesh and Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.20

References

1. Binas, R. (2009). Making Community Managed Disaster Risk Reduction Operational at Community Level: A Guide. Caritas Czech Republic.Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

2. Cañete, Rhinadel; Lisay, Samantha Kay; Sayadat, Md. (2025). Project DINGGIN: A Hybrid Approach to Empowering Communities through Risk-Based and Inclusive Cash Transfers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21460.92804

3. Carla S, R. G. (2019). School-Community Collaboration: Disaster Preparedness for Building Resilient Communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 1(2), 45-59.

4. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalising the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

5. Cvetković, V. M., Tanasić, J., Ocal, A., Kešetović, Ž., Nikolić, N., & Dragašević, A. (2021). Capacity Development of Local Self-Governments for Disaster Risk Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910406

6. Cvetković, V., Öcal, A., & Ivanov, A. (2019). Young adults’ fear of disasters: A case study of residents from Turkey, Serbia and Macedonia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 35, 101095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101095

7. Cvetković, V., Šišović, V. (2024). Community Disaster Resilience in Serbia. Belgrade: Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management.

8. Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education (Institute of Medicine). (2015). The Bridging Leadership Paradigm for Multi-Stakeholder Governance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

9. Government of Bangladesh. (2012). Disaster Management Act, 2012 (Act No. 34 of 2012). Dhaka: Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

10. Government of Bangladesh. (2013). Rights and Protection of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2013. Dhaka: Ministry of Social Welfare.

11. Government of Bangladesh. (2019). Standing Orders on Disaster (Revised Edition). Dhaka: Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief.

12. Government of Bangladesh. (2020). National Plan for Disaster Management (NPDM) 2021–2025. Dhaka: Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief.

13. Institute of Medicine. (2015). Envisioning the Future of Health Professional Education: Workshop Summary. (See Appendix F: Bridging Leadership Framework). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

14. Kabir, M. H., Hossain, T., & Haque, M. W. (2022). Resilience to natural disasters: A case study on the southwestern region of coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 4(2), 91-105.

15. Lisay, Samantha Kay & Sayadat, Md & Cañete, Rhinadel. (2025). A Risk-Informed, Inclusive Approach to Cash Transfers: Empowering Communities Through Hybrid Governance.

16. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150.

17. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18. Republic of the Philippines. (1992). Magna Carta for Disabled Persons (Republic Act No. 7277). Manila: Congress of the Philippines.

19. Republic of the Philippines. (2010). Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 (Republic Act No. 10121). Manila: Congress of the Philippines.

20. Republic of the Philippines. (2020). National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan (NDRRMP) 2020–2030. Manila: National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council.

21. Sphere Association. (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Geneva: Sphere.

22. Van Aalst, M. K., Cannon, T., & Burton, I. (2008). Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 165–179.