Declination of the Strategic Compass: Transatlantic Elites, German Leadership, and the Future of European Security

Authors

Vladimir Ilić, Miraš Milašinović

Abstract

The appointment of Friedrich Merz as Germany’s new Chancellor, following an unusual repeat vote, marked a significant shift in German and broader European political dynamics. This paper examines the enduring influence of transatlantic networks, notably the Atlantic Bridge (Atlantik-Brücke), on Germany’s strategic orientation within the evolving European security architecture. Through comparative and analytical-deductive methods, the study explores how elite transnational structures, shaped by economic and ideological power centres, influence the implementation and limitations of the European Union’s Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. The paper argues that this strategic framework, conceived as a response to contemporary crises such as the war in Ukraine, may be increasingly subject to “declinations” driven by competing geopolitical interests and internal legitimacy challenges within EU member states. By tracing the personal and institutional ties of key actors, including Chancellor Merz, the paper sheds light on the deeper geopolitical alignments that underpin NATO-EU cooperation and transatlantic risk governance. The findings highlight the urgent need for a more balanced and citizen-oriented security strategy if lasting peace and stability are to be achieved in Europe.

Keywords

security, emergency, Friedrich Merz, Atlantic Bridge, Strategic Compass, European Security, NATO, Transatlantic Elites, Risk Governance, Ukraine, Germany, EU Foreign Policy

Publication Details

Journal: International Journal of Disaster Risk Management
Year: 2025
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 495-506
Published: 2025-06-16

DOI and Full Text

DOI: View DOI record
Article Page: View article page
PDF: Download full-text PDF

Suggested Citation

Ilić, V., & Milašinović, M. (2025). Declination of the Strategic Compass: Transatlantic Elites, German Leadership, and the Future of European Security. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.28

References

1. Reagan Library. (n.d.). Proclamation 5665. Retrieved from https://www.reaganlibrary.gov

2. AfD. (n.d.). Manifesto for Germany. Retrieved from http://www.afd.de

3. Bled, J.-P. (2011). Bismarck. Belgrade: NNK International.

4. Bodson, G. (1996). The new world order and Yugoslavia. Belgrade: ING-PRO.

5. Ilić, V. (2002). The Family – The Media's New World Order. Belgrade: Konras.

6. Ilić, V. (2020). Prometheus – Media “Nazification” of the Serbian people. Kragujevac: Konras Foundation.

7. Kaplan, R. D. (2023). Adriatic Sea – Agreement of civilisations at the end of the new century. Belgrade: Laguna.

8. Kissinger, H. (2015). World order. Belgrade: Club Plus.

9. Milosavljević, S. (2014). Russia and “Peace”: The security strategy of the Russian Federation: Geopolitical, energy and military aspects. Belgrade: Academic Thought – Innovation Center of the Faculty of Security, University of Belgrade.

10. Phillips, P. (2021). Giants – The global power elite. Belgrade: Clio.

11. Stone, O. (2017). Interviews with Vladimir Putin. Belgrade: Russia.

12. Ulfkotte, U. (2014). Gekaufte Journalisten – Wie Politiker, Geheimdienste und Hochfinanz Deutschlands Massenmedien lenken. Rottenburg: Kopp Verlag.

13. Vukašinović, M. (2003). Encounters – Selected conversations. Nova Pazova: Bonart.

14. Hasan, M. K., & Niger Sultana. (2024). Dynamics of Internal Migration in the Southwest Region of Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(1), 13–26.

15. Sudar, S., Cvetković, V. M., & Ivanov, A. (2024). Harmonization of Soft Power and Institutional Skills: Montenegro’s Path to Accession to the European Union in the Environmental Sector. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(1), 41–74.

16. Aleksandrina, M., Budiarti, D., Yu, Z., Pasha, F., & Shaw, R. (2019). Governmental Incentivization for SMEs’ Engagement in Disaster Resilience in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 1(1), 32-50.

17. European Journalism Observatory. (2017, January 20). European media ponder a Trump presidency. Retrieved from https://en.ejo.ch

18. Kress.de. (2017, June 30). My friend Helmut Kohl. Retrieved from https://kress.de/news/beitrag

19. Atlantic-Brücke. (2017, October 24). Atlantic-Brücke’s beginnings. Retrieved from https://www.atlantik-bruecke.org

20. Private Banker International. (2018, January 22). BlackRock hires new business head for Germany, Austria and Eastern Europe. Retrieved from https://privatebankerinternational.com

21. Inet Economics. (2018, June 20). The American behind the Deutsche Mark. Retrieved from https://www.ineteconomics.org

22. DGAP. (2022, February 24). Ways into the future: Perspectives for foreign policy. Retrieved from https://dgap.org

23. European Union External Action Service. (2022, March 22). A Strategic Compass – EEAS – European Union. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu

24. The Times. (2025, January 12). Friedrich Merz’s economic cure for Germany, the sick man of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.thetimes.com

25. Al Jazeera. (2025, January 18). Biden’s Ukraine disaster was decades in the making. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com

26. Britannica. (2025, April 17). Konrad Adenauer, West German Chancellor and the father of German reunification. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com

27. Deutschland.de. (2025, May 6). Friedrich Merz: Conservative transatlanticist. Retrieved from https://www.deutschland.de

28. News.err.ee. (2025, May 13). ICDS head: The future of European security largely depends on Germany. Retrieved from https://news.err.ee

29. Euractiv. (2025, May 14). Germany’s Merz vows to build Europe’s strongest military. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com